No Products in the Cart
Your horse's diet can make or break their performance, health, and longevity, and yet so many owners are still guessing when it comes to balancing protein and sugar levels. If you have a horse with metabolic issues, an insulin-resistant senior, or a hard-working athlete who needs muscle support without the sugar spike, finding the right high protein low sugar horse feed is not just a preference; it is a necessity.
The market is flooded with options, each promising optimal nutrition, but not all feeds are created equal. Some deliver impressive protein numbers while quietly loading your horse with hidden sugars and starches. Others keep sugar low but sacrifice the amino acid profile your horse actually needs to thrive.
In this comparison, we cut through the marketing noise and break down the top high protein low sugar horse feed options available today. You will learn what to look for on a feed label, how different formulas stack up against each other, and which choices are best suited for specific horse types and health conditions. By the end, you will have the clarity to make a confident, informed decision.
For horses with metabolic vulnerabilities, the relationship between dietary protein and sugar is not a minor nutritional detail. It is a clinical priority with direct consequences. Horses diagnosed with Equine Metabolic Syndrome (EMS), insulin dysregulation, PPID (Cushing's disease), or a history of laminitis are acutely sensitive to even moderate carbohydrate loads in their forage. According to the ECIR Group's treatment protocols for EMS and insulin resistance, dietary control of starch and simple sugar, specifically the hydrolyzable carbohydrate fraction represented by ESC and starch combined, sits at the heart of managing these conditions. Non-structural carbohydrates (NSC) above 10 to 12% dry matter are widely cited as a threshold of concern, and because horses consume forage at 1.5 to 2% of their body weight daily, the forage itself becomes the single highest-leverage dietary variable an owner can control.
The complexity deepens when protein requirements enter the equation. Performance and sport horses legitimately require crude protein at approximately 12 to 14% of diet dry matter to support muscle repair, topline development, and recovery after exertion. However, delivering that protein through cereal-grain concentrates or high-sugar feed mixes creates a glycemic tradeoff that directly undermines metabolic stability. This tension is most acute in horses that carry both a performance workload and a metabolic predisposition, a combination that is far more common than many owners realize. Research cited by Kentucky Performance Products on protein and insulin dysregulation further found that EMS horses fed a ration balancer containing 31% crude protein showed an insulinemic response nine times greater than healthy control horses, confirming that protein concentration itself carries insulinogenic risk when levels are excessive.
The challenge extends beyond performance horses. Seniors and maintenance horses face a compounded problem: insufficient protein accelerates muscle wasting and topline loss as horses age, while excess dietary sugar contributes to weight dysregulation, hindgut disruption, and increased laminitis risk. According to guidance from Mad Barn on feeding metabolic horses, aging horses require carefully balanced rations that preserve lean mass without pushing carbohydrate intake above the metabolic threshold. This dual requirement, adequate protein paired with controlled sugar, reflects a nutritional standard that applies across virtually every horse category, from the senior pasture companion to the competitive sport horse.
The broader market has taken notice. The global horse feed industry is now formally segmented by nutritional type, including High Fibre, Low Starch, High Protein, and High Fat categories, confirming that the protein-to-sugar balance is a recognized commercial and clinical axis, not a fringe concern. Selecting forage and feed that genuinely delivers on both sides of this balance remains the most consequential decision in any horse's nutrition program.
The protein percentage on a feed label tells only part of the story. Most commercial high-protein feeds achieve their protein targets through grain-based or soy-derived concentrate fractions, and those same ingredients carry a significant starch and sugar payload. The result is a hidden glycemic load that directly contradicts any low-sugar claim on the packaging. Concentrates, whether textured sweet feeds, plain grains, or blended pellets, typically derive their energy almost entirely from starch and sugar. When fed in quantities sufficient to hit protein targets, they simultaneously stress the digestive tract and elevate laminitis and colic risk in metabolically sensitive horses.
Molasses compounds the problem in ways that rarely reach the owner's attention. Containing approximately 50% sugar, molasses is routinely added to pelleted feeds and compound rations as a palatability binder and dust suppressant. Its sugar contribution sits within the ethanol-soluble carbohydrate (ESC) fraction, which is the most metabolically relevant measure for insulin response, yet this detail is frequently buried in the ingredient list rather than foregrounded in the guaranteed analysis panel. For horses managing Equine Metabolic Syndrome, insulin dysregulation, or a history of laminitis, those unlisted grams matter clinically. Research published in the Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine confirmed that horses with EMS experience an exaggerated and prolonged insulin response even to relatively modest NSC loads, making label transparency a genuine welfare issue rather than a consumer preference.
The digestive consequences extend beyond metabolism. The small intestine handles starch efficiently at low volumes, but concentrate meals that exceed its capacity pass undigested starch into the hindgut. Once there, rapid fermentation disrupts microbial balance, produces lactic acid, drops cecal pH, and elevates risk of colic, acidosis, and diarrhea. This mechanism is well-documented, yet feed formulations routinely include starch loads that test these physiological limits.
Market dynamics are amplifying rather than correcting these issues. The weight-gain horse feed segment is projected to grow at a CAGR of 10.1% from 2026 to 2033, reflecting genuine demand for performance-focused nutrition. That growth trajectory also creates commercial pressure to prioritize palatability and caloric density, with molasses being the most cost-effective lever available to manufacturers. As Pure Feed Company's nutritionist-led guidance illustrates, a feed labeled at 10% sugar and starch fed at 2 kg per day delivers 200 g of sugar and starch per meal, four times the load of the same product fed at 500 g. Percentage labels without serving-size context give owners a false sense of metabolic safety.
Feed format introduces a final layer of compromise. Pellets are valued for consistent nutrient delivery and reduced sorting, but the heat and pressure involved in pelleting can degrade heat-sensitive amino acids, particularly lysine, through Maillard reaction bonding that reduces bioavailability. The structural fiber present in whole forage, which slows glucose absorption and supports hindgut motility, is removed or fractured during processing. These tradeoffs are rarely disclosed on product labels, leaving horse owners to evaluate high-protein feed options without the ingredient-level transparency needed to make genuinely low-sugar, gut-safe choices.
Choosing the right feed comes down to understanding what the numbers actually mean across the full nutritional profile, not just the protein line on a label. The table below benchmarks four common feeding options across five metrics that matter most for horses requiring high protein alongside controlled sugar intake.
Feed Type |
Crude Protein (% DM) |
ESC (% DM) |
WSC (% DM) |
Calcium (% DM) |
Digestible Energy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sainfoin hay |
14-20% |
3-5% |
<10% |
Moderate, balanced |
~1.0 Mcal/lb |
Alfalfa hay |
17-22% |
3-6% |
8-14% |
1.2-1.8% |
1.0-1.1 Mcal/lb |
Timothy hay |
7-11% |
Low |
6-10% |
0.3-0.5% |
0.85-0.95 Mcal/lb |
High-protein pellet |
14-16% |
Variable |
Variable |
Variable |
Variable |
Alfalfa presents a compelling protein argument, and the numbers support it. At 17-22% crude protein on a dry matter basis, it outperforms most forage options. The challenge is that its sugar load, particularly WSC values ranging from 8-14% DM, fluctuates significantly depending on cutting order, growing conditions, and harvest timing. First-cutting alfalfa harvested at peak maturity will carry lower sugar than younger, leafier cuttings, but owners rarely have full visibility into those variables at the point of purchase. More consistently problematic is alfalfa's calcium profile. At 1.2-1.8% DM calcium against only 0.2-0.3% DM phosphorus, the calcium-to-phosphorus ratio can exceed 6:1. For horses fed alfalfa as a primary forage over months or years, this imbalance creates a meaningful long-term mineral management challenge that requires active correction through supplementation. You can review a detailed comparison of timothy hay vs alfalfa hay for horses for further context on these mineral differences.
Timothy hay earns its reputation as a conservative, lower-risk forage. Its WSC values typically fall between 6-10% DM, and its calcium load at 0.3-0.5% DM is mild and unlikely to create imbalance. For easy keepers, metabolic horses, or those on strict weight management, timothy is a reasonable primary forage. However, at only 7-11% crude protein DM, it cannot independently meet the demands of performance horses, senior horses experiencing topline and muscle loss, or mares in the final trimester of gestation. Using timothy as a sole forage for these horses effectively trades one problem for another: sugar is controlled, but protein adequacy is sacrificed. Blending timothy with a higher-protein forage or supplement is necessary, which adds cost and complexity to the feeding program.
High-protein pelleted feeds appear to solve the protein gap at 14-16% crude protein. The problem lies beneath that headline figure. The University of Georgia Equine Program defines non-structural carbohydrates (NSC) as the combined measure of sugars and starches likely to raise blood glucose and insulin levels. When starch and sugar are evaluated together for many commercial pellet formulations, total NSC can reach 20-35% DM, a level that directly conflicts with low-sugar feeding goals regardless of how the protein percentage reads on the bag. Pellets offer consistent nutrient delivery and reduced sorting, but the starch-derived energy that drives their calorie density is exactly what horses with insulin dysregulation, laminitis risk, or metabolic sensitivity cannot tolerate.
Sainfoin hay occupies a genuinely rare position in this comparison. As confirmed in the sainfoin forage ingredient analysis maintained in a dedicated equine feed database, sainfoin is classified as a legume forage, placing it in the same plant family as alfalfa. Yet its nutritional profile is meaningfully different. Crude protein typically ranges from 14-20% DM, matching or approaching alfalfa's output, while ESC values remain in the 3-5% range and WSC values commonly fall below 10% DM. Calcium levels do not carry the extreme imbalance risk associated with alfalfa. The result is a forage that delivers performance-level protein within a low-sugar profile without requiring processing, starch-based energy carriers, or compensatory mineral supplementation. For horses that need both objectives met simultaneously, no other single forage option in this comparison achieves that balance as consistently.
Sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia) occupies a genuinely distinct position among high-protein forages, and the distinction is not cosmetic. It is biochemical, structural, and agronomic. Understanding exactly why requires looking at what other forages lack, not just what sainfoin provides.
The central differentiator is sainfoin's naturally occurring condensed tannins (CTs), polyphenolic compounds found throughout the plant's leaf and stem tissue. These tannins bind dietary protein in the foregut, protecting it from microbial degradation before it reaches the small intestine, where enzymatic digestion can extract and absorb it efficiently. This process, known as protein bypass, fundamentally changes how much nutritional value a horse actually captures from each gram of protein consumed. According to a 2026 peer-reviewed comparative review drawing on 80 studies, sainfoin's CTs enhance nitrogen efficiency by 25 to 30 percent compared to tannin-free forages. Alfalfa, despite competitive crude protein levels, delivers that protein in a form that is substantially degraded by hindgut microbes before absorption, generating nitrogen waste rather than usable amino acids. Sainfoin's tannin-bound protein survives further into the digestive tract, making each feeding more efficient at the cellular level.
Condensed tannins do more than protect protein. They also inhibit the methanogenic and gas-producing bacterial populations responsible for fermentative gas accumulation in the digestive tract. Research from the ruminant nutrition literature documents methane reductions of 20 to 23 percent in sainfoin-fed animals compared to bloat-prone legumes like alfalfa. For horses, hindgut fermenters with a cecum and large colon sensitive to gas pressure, this parallel mechanism carries meaningful clinical relevance. As little as 20 percent sainfoin inclusion in the total diet has been shown to measurably reduce gas produced by other feeds in the ration, making it a practical tool for horses prone to gas colic rather than a complete dietary replacement.
The tannin-mediated antimicrobial effect extends beyond gas reduction. Sainfoin's CTs selectively interfere with pathogenic bacterial populations and parasite surface proteins without disrupting the beneficial fiber-fermenting microbes that drive healthy hindgut function. A 2022 study published in Animals (PMC/NIH) examined horses fed sainfoin forage and found dietary inclusion altered strongyle infection dynamics, demonstrating measurable tannin-mediated interference with parasite metabolism. This is particularly relevant given growing concern about anthelmintic resistance in equine cyathostomins; dietary approaches that reduce parasite burden naturally are gaining clinical attention as a complementary strategy.
Heavenly Hay's sainfoin is naturally non-GMO, and this is worth stating precisely. No commercial GMO sainfoin variety exists. The plant's protein content, tannin profile, and low-sugar characteristics are native to its biology, not engineered outcomes. This is not a certified-organic marketing label; it is a statement about seed-level integrity. For horse owners increasingly concerned about the long-term effects of genetically modified feed ingredients on gut microbiome diversity and immune function, that distinction matters. Sainfoin also fixes its own nitrogen at 100 to 150 kg per hectare annually, meaning its production requires no synthetic nitrogen fertilizers, further supporting a clean agronomic profile.
Perhaps most importantly for owners focused on feed transparency, sainfoin's benefits arrive without manufacturing intervention. The protein level, tannin concentration, and low-sugar profile are intrinsic to the plant at harvest. No added buffers, binders, preservatives, or processing steps are required to achieve the nutritional targets that make this forage valuable. Preservation research confirms that the relevant question with sainfoin is how to retain existing tannins through the drying process, not how to introduce them. No manufacturing step introduces hidden carbohydrate fractions, and no label inspection is required to account for processing additives. What the plant produces is what the horse receives.
Horses in active training or competition place extraordinary demands on muscle protein synthesis, and the nutritional strategy used to meet those demands has measurable consequences on performance and recovery. The global sport and race horse feed market represents one of the fastest-growing segments in equine nutrition, with dedicated research tracking buyer demand for performance-targeted solutions through 2034. Sainfoin's condensed tannin mechanism delivers a functionally superior protein profile by protecting amino acids from rumen degradation and releasing them further along the digestive tract, where absorption is more efficient. This protein bypass efficiency supports muscle repair and development during peak training loads without the glycemic disruption that accompanies concentrate-heavy feeding programs. For performance horse owners managing insulin sensitivity alongside conditioning targets, this distinction is not trivial.
Aging horses face a dual nutritional challenge that standard forage rarely addresses adequately. Digestive efficiency declines with age, meaning seniors extract progressively less nutritional value from the same volume of feed, while sarcopenia (progressive muscle wasting) creates an escalating need for high-quality, bioavailable protein. Sainfoin's condensed tannins improve amino acid availability at precisely the point in the digestive process where seniors struggle most, delivering more usable protein per pound than conventional grass hay. Equally important, sainfoin's low sugar profile reduces the risk of insulin-related weight gain, a clinically significant concern given that older horses are disproportionately affected by insulin dysregulation. Sainfoin forage analysis data from Mad Barn confirms the ingredient's relevance to senior horse nutrition across multiple metabolic markers.
For horses with confirmed insulin dysregulation, a laminitis history, or a PPID diagnosis, forage selection is not a preference. It is a medical decision. WSC and ESC values are the primary selection criteria for this population, and finding a forage that scores acceptably on both sugar metrics while still delivering meaningful protein is genuinely difficult. Most low-sugar forages compromise on protein, and most high-protein options introduce unacceptable sugar loads. Sainfoin addresses both criteria within a single ingredient, making it a rare functional forage for horses where the stakes of getting it wrong are highest. Nutritionists working with metabolic horses consistently emphasize that hay testing must precede any feeding protocol, and sainfoin's naturally consistent nutritional profile offers a more predictable baseline than variable-quality grass hay sources.
Late-gestation and lactating mares carry protein requirements running 20 to 30 percent above maintenance levels, a demand that timothy hay cannot adequately meet on its own. Alfalfa can supply the protein volume, but it introduces an excess calcium load that disrupts the calcium-to-phosphorus ratio critical in growing foals, along with variable sugar content that creates its own management complications. Sainfoin meets the elevated protein requirements of breeding stock without the mineral imbalance associated with alfalfa-dominant diets, and its amino acid profile supports both maternal tissue maintenance and fetal development. Industry recognition of this application is reflected in commercial product formulations that specifically incorporate sainfoin for breeding stock, signaling that the equine nutrition sector has identified this population as a clear use case.
For horses rebuilding topline or recovering from illness, injury, or extended stall rest, crude protein figures on a guaranteed analysis are a poor proxy for actual nutritional benefit. What matters is how much of that protein reaches the lower gut intact for absorption, and that is precisely where sainfoin's condensed tannin mechanism creates a measurable advantage over conventional forage. By binding proteins in the upper digestive tract and releasing them in the more absorbent lower gut environment, sainfoin delivers more usable amino acids per pound than options with comparable or even higher crude protein values. Hard keepers and recovery horses are not simply under-fed; they are often under-absorbing, and addressing that distinction requires a forage with the right biochemical profile, not just a higher number on the label.
Switching your horse to any new forage requires patience, but sainfoin's condensed tannin content and elevated protein density make a structured, phased approach especially important. Abrupt dietary changes are a recognized cause of colic and digestive upset, because hindgut microbial populations need time to adjust to shifts in fermentable substrate. A gradual protocol protects that microbial balance while allowing your horse's digestive system to acclimate to sainfoin's unique biochemical profile.
Begin the first week with a blend of 25% sainfoin and 75% of your horse's current forage. This ratio keeps the volume of new material low enough that hindgut bacteria can begin adapting to the tannin content without becoming overwhelmed. Watch manure consistency closely during this phase; slightly firmer output is common and expected, while loose or watery manure signals that the transition is moving too quickly. If digestive upset occurs, hold the current ratio for an additional three to four days before proceeding.
In the second week, shift to equal parts sainfoin and existing forage. Continue monitoring manure quality, but also track energy level and water intake. A measurable increase in water consumption during this phase is a normal physiological response. As protein metabolism increases, renal demand rises to process and excrete nitrogen byproducts, which elevates thirst. This should not be interpreted as a sign of distress. Tools like the Equine Diet Transition Calculator from Mad Barn can help you build a precise schedule tailored to your horse's current ration and target intake.
Performance horses in active training can generally progress to 75-100% sainfoin inclusion by weeks three to four. As sainfoin's protein contribution increases, concentrate rations should be adjusted downward to prevent over-supplementation. Feeding excess protein does not build additional muscle; it simply increases metabolic load and urinary nitrogen output. Recalculate your total ration at each transition stage to keep crude protein within the range appropriate for your horse's workload and body weight.
Horses with EMS, PPID, or a history of laminitis require a more conservative timeline of four to six weeks. Although sainfoin is naturally lower in non-structural carbohydrates than many other forages, any dietary change in metabolic horses warrants careful oversight. Body condition score should be tracked at regular intervals using a consistent methodology, and where possible, insulin or glucose spot-checks coordinated with your veterinarian during the first 60 days provide an objective baseline for evaluating how the horse is responding. For a broader framework on feeding metabolic horses, consulting specialist guidance alongside your veterinarian's input is strongly recommended.
Within the first 30 days, most owners begin noticing tangible changes in topline definition, manure quality, and coat condition. These improvements reflect the gradual but consistent effects of condensed tannins on protein utilization and hindgut health. Because the changes accumulate incrementally, they can be easy to underestimate without a reference point. Taking photographs and recording weight-tape measurements at the start of the transition gives you an objective baseline that makes progress unmistakable by the end of the first month.
The higher price tag on premium sainfoin is a legitimate consideration, and buyers are right to demand a clear value case before committing. Global horse feed research consistently identifies cost as a market constraint for specialty forages, noting that premium formulations require a quantified value proposition to compete against commodity alfalfa or bagged concentrates. The question is whether you are framing the comparison correctly.
The relevant unit of analysis is not what you pay per bale or per kilogram. It is what you pay per unit of absorbed protein. Sainfoin's condensed tannins protect dietary protein from premature bacterial fermentation in the hindgut, allowing a greater proportion of amino acids to reach systemic circulation intact. This bypass mechanism means a horse fed sainfoin is extracting meaningfully more usable protein per pound of forage than a horse fed a tannin-free alternative at a comparable crude protein percentage. In practical terms, you may achieve equivalent muscle-building and recovery outcomes on a smaller daily volume of sainfoin, which compresses the real cost gap considerably.
Horses maintained on high-quality, naturally balanced forage like Heavenly Hay's sainfoin frequently require fewer protein top-dressings, digestive support products, and concentrate additions. Owners report improvements in topline, coat quality, and weight maintenance without the layered supplement programs that commodity hay diets often demand. When you subtract those ongoing supplementation costs from the forage premium, the net price difference for many owners narrows substantially or disappears entirely.
For laminitis-prone or metabolic horses, the cost framing shifts entirely. A single laminitis episode involving veterinary intervention, corrective farriery, box rest, and lost training weeks carries financial consequences that dwarf the price differential between premium low-sugar forage and a cheaper alternative with unpredictable sugar variability. Feeding a reliably low-sugar forage is, in this context, a risk-management decision with a clear economic logic.
The global horse feed market is projected to grow from $10.3 billion in 2025 to $14.4 billion by 2032 at a 4.9% CAGR, with natural ingredients, non-GMO status, and targeted nutrition identified as the dominant growth drivers. Premium sainfoin sits precisely at that intersection. You can review sainfoin's full nutritional profile in the Equine Feed Database for independent ingredient data to support your purchasing decision. Choosing sainfoin now is not paying a premium for novelty; it is investing in the nutritional standard the broader market is actively moving toward.
Yes, and it is worth understanding why. PPID horses frequently develop secondary insulin dysregulation, which means dietary sugar management becomes a veterinary priority rather than a general preference. Current equine nutrition guidelines recommend keeping NSC content below 10 to 12% for insulin-sensitive horses to avoid triggering the kind of insulin spikes that can progress to laminitis. Sainfoin's ESC values typically fall in the 3 to 5% range, placing it well within that threshold and making it one of the more conservative forage choices available for horses managing both PPID and insulin dysregulation simultaneously. For detailed feeding guidance for PPID horses, How to Feed a Horse with PPID provides a structured ten-step clinical framework worth reviewing alongside your veterinarian.
For most horses, yes. Sainfoin matches or exceeds alfalfa's crude protein content while offering a more favorable calcium-to-phosphorus ratio, lower sugar variability between cuttings, and the additional advantage of condensed tannins, which alfalfa simply does not contain. Those condensed tannins actively improve protein absorption efficiency, meaning horses often extract more usable amino acids from sainfoin even when total protein figures appear comparable on paper.
These two feed types serve different structural roles. Ration balancers deliver concentrated micronutrients but provide no long-stem fiber. Sainfoin delivers both macronutrient quality and the physical fiber structure necessary for healthy gut motility. Research has also flagged that high-protein ration balancers, particularly those above 30% protein, can produce significant insulinemic responses in metabolically sensitive horses; a 15% protein balancer is generally considered safer for that population. Sainfoin and a well-chosen balancer work as complements, not substitutes.
No, not at naturally occurring levels. Condensed tannins in sainfoin measure approximately 1 to 4% of dry matter, and at those concentrations they support gut health rather than compromising it. The toxicity concern associated with tannins relates specifically to hydrolyzable tannins found in oak leaves and similar plants; these are structurally and metabolically distinct from the condensed tannins in sainfoin and should not be conflated.
Store sainfoin in a dry, well-ventilated space away from direct sunlight. Because sainfoin is harvested at relatively low moisture content when properly cured, it is inherently stable. However, moisture exposure degrades both the protein fraction and the condensed tannin content faster than it would in lower-protein hays, making dry storage conditions more critical than they might be for conventional grass hay.
The right choice comes down to three non-negotiable criteria: protein level matched to life stage and workload, ESC/WSC values verified through laboratory analysis rather than label language, and a nutritional profile that is intrinsic to the plant rather than engineered through processing. These criteria, applied together, produce a decision framework that holds regardless of whether you are feeding a metabolic maintenance horse or an elite performance athlete.
Sainfoin is the only single forage ingredient that currently satisfies all three criteria simultaneously. It delivers performance-level crude protein, genuinely low water-soluble carbohydrates, condensed tannin benefits that improve protein utilization and support gut health, and non-GMO status by nature rather than certification workaround. No processed concentrate and no conventional forage replicates that combination in one ingredient.
The actionable next step is straightforward: request a laboratory forage analysis for your current hay, benchmark the crude protein and WSC/ESC figures against sainfoin standards, and bring that comparison to your veterinarian or equine nutritionist to build a structured transition plan. Data drives better decisions than assumptions. Understanding sugar and starch fractions in hay provides useful context for interpreting those values accurately.
Heavenly Hay's sainfoin is available for direct order, and horses in active training, metabolic management, or everyday maintenance all represent strong starting points for trialing it as a primary forage source.
Choosing the right high protein low sugar horse feed does not have to feel overwhelming. Keep these key takeaways in mind: always check the NSC percentage on the label, prioritize feeds with a complete amino acid profile, and match the formula to your horse's specific life stage or workload. Not every "healthy" feed lives up to its marketing claims, so reading labels critically is your most powerful tool.
Your horse's health, performance, and comfort depend on the decisions you make at feeding time. The right feed can support lean muscle, stabilize energy levels, and protect metabolic health for years to come.
Start by assessing your horse's current diet today. Compare it against the top options covered in this guide, consult your veterinarian or equine nutritionist, and make the switch that gives your horse the foundation they deserve.
