No Products in the Cart
If you've spent any time around horses with respiratory issues, metabolic conditions, or dental challenges, chances are someone has recommended soaking your hay. But is it always necessary, and is it actually worth the effort? Understanding the benefits of soaking hay can help you make smarter feeding decisions for your horse rather than simply following blanket advice.
Soaking hay is more than just dunking a flake in a bucket of water. Done correctly, it can reduce sugar content, minimize dust and mold spores, and make chewing easier for horses with compromised teeth. However, it also comes with real costs in terms of time, labor, and even nutritional tradeoffs that every horse owner should weigh carefully.
In this post, we'll break down exactly what soaking hay does to its nutritional profile, the practical costs involved, and the specific situations where it delivers the most benefit. We'll also cover when you can skip it entirely without putting your horse at risk. Whether you're managing a horse with Cushing's disease or simply trying to reduce stable dust, this guide will give you the clarity you need.
Soaking hay is a deliberate intervention with measurable physiological consequences, and understanding the full scope of what happens during submersion helps horse owners make more informed forage decisions.
The primary mechanism is straightforward: when hay is submerged in water, water-soluble carbohydrates (WSC), including simple sugars and fructans, dissolve out of the forage matrix and into the surrounding water. This reduces the glycemic load of each mouthful before the horse ever consumes it, making soaked hay a commonly recommended strategy for horses managing laminitis, equine metabolic syndrome, or insulin dysregulation. According to Tribute Equine Nutrition's soaking guide, soaking is one of the most accessible first-line dietary interventions available to owners of metabolically sensitive horses.
Soaking simultaneously strips dust, mold spores, and respirable fine particles from the forage. This makes it a relevant management tool for horses with recurrent airway obstruction or inflammatory airway disease, where reducing inhaled particulates is a priority alongside sugar reduction.
However, the process does not selectively target sugars alone. Water-soluble vitamins, particularly B vitamins, along with minerals such as potassium and sodium, are also leached into the soaking water. The nutritional profile of the remaining hay shifts in ways that extend well beyond WSC reduction, and horses on long-term soaked-hay regimens may develop nutritional gaps requiring supplementation.
Dry matter content also drops measurably during soaking. SPILLERS advises feeding approximately 20% more hay by weight after soaking to compensate for what is lost into the water, a practical adjustment many owners overlook when calculating rations.
Kentucky Equine Research confirms that the extent of these changes varies according to hay type, water temperature, and soak duration, meaning results are not guaranteed or consistent batch to batch. Practitioners in the FeedXL Horse Nutrition Forum reinforce this point, noting that some hay batches show little to no measurable WSC reduction regardless of soak time, which underscores the value of hay analysis before and after soaking for higher-risk horses.
For horses managing Equine Metabolic Syndrome, insulin dysregulation, or a history of laminitis, water-soluble carbohydrates in forage are not just a dietary consideration; they are a genuine clinical risk factor. WSC, which includes simple sugars and fructans, drives insulin responses directly. When insulin regulation is already compromised, even moderate spikes triggered by forage intake can contribute to systemic inflammation and, in worst-case scenarios, laminitic episodes. Soaking hay works by leaching these water-soluble compounds out of the forage and into the surrounding water, which is then discarded. A peer-reviewed study published in The Veterinary Journal confirmed that cold-water soaking of grass hay produced a 38% reduction in non-structural carbohydrates and a 6.78% reduction in digestible energy, with horses fed soaked, restricted hay over six weeks losing an average of 6.8% body mass alongside measurable improvements in insulin sensitivity. These figures underscore why soaking has become a front-line forage management tool for metabolic horses.
Soaking duration is not arbitrary. According to SPILLERS, a widely referenced equine nutrition authority, the recommended approach involves soaking for 1 to 3 hours in warm weather (16°C/61°F and above) and 6 to 12 hours in cold weather, with hay kept fully submerged and fresh water used for each individual soak. Water temperature and volume both influence how much WSC is removed, which means cutting corners on submersion or reusing soaking water will compromise results. Additionally, research published in the Journal of Animal Science by the University of Guelph demonstrated that treating timothy-alfalfa hay through soaking significantly altered its nutrient profile and produced measurable changes in the acute glycemic response of Standardbred racehorses, confirming that how hay is treated before feeding has direct blood sugar consequences.
Horse owners should understand one critical limitation: WSC reduction from soaking is real, but it is not reliably predictable. Starting WSC values differ dramatically across hay types, cuts, seasons, and individual batches. If a batch begins with exceptionally high WSC, it may remain above a safe threshold even after a full soak. This is why equine nutrition experts increasingly recommend hay analysis before soaking for horses classified as higher-risk, treating the pre-soak test result as the baseline that informs the entire feeding strategy. For horses actively managing laminitis or confirmed EMS, soaking should function as one component within a broader, veterinarian-guided management plan, not as a substitute for professional oversight. Soaking reduces dietary risk; it does not eliminate the underlying metabolic vulnerability.
For horses diagnosed with Equine Asthma Syndrome (formerly called heaves), Inflammatory Airway Disease (IAD), or any condition involving heightened sensitivity to airborne particles, soaking hay before feeding delivers a meaningful and immediate respiratory benefit. The mechanism is straightforward: wetting hay causes fine dust particles and mold spores to clump together and become weighed down, preventing them from becoming airborne during feeding. A 2023 study from the Université de Montréal, published in the Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine, examined the effects of soaked hay on lung function and airway inflammation in horses with severe asthma and found measurable improvements, lending peer-reviewed clinical support to this practice beyond anecdotal recommendation.
One of the most important things horse owners need to understand is that hay does not need to look dusty or moldy to pose a respiratory threat. Fine respirable particles, small enough to penetrate deep into the equine airway, are invisible to the naked eye and present even in hay that appears to be in good condition. Soaking eliminates this risk at the point of feeding and requires no specialized or expensive equipment, making it one of the most accessible and practical respiratory management tools available. As Kentucky Equine Research notes, the benefits extend well beyond basic dust reduction, with soaking producing measurable improvements in lung function in asthmatic horses.
Horse owners managing active respiratory cases should understand a critical distinction. Soaking suppresses dust and mold spores by wetting and weighing them down; it does not destroy them. Steaming, by contrast, uses heat to kill mold, bacteria, and other pathogens, making it hygienically superior. For horses where both water-soluble carbohydrate reduction and improved forage hygiene are priorities, a combined approach, soaking followed by commercial steaming, is increasingly recommended by equine nutrition advisors as the most comprehensive outcome. Soaking is a genuine and meaningful improvement over feeding dry hay to a respiratory horse, but owners should treat it as a practical first step rather than a complete solution when pathogen elimination is the primary clinical concern.
Dental compromise is one of the most overlooked drivers of poor condition in horses, particularly seniors. As horses age, their teeth wear unevenly, develop sharp points, or break down entirely, making effective mastication of dry long-stem hay increasingly difficult. Horses recovering from dental procedures face a similar challenge, even if temporarily. When a horse cannot grind forage properly, the digestive consequences extend well beyond discomfort at the feed bucket. Signs of dentition-related chewing difficulty include slow eating, dropping partially chewed feed from the mouth (quidding), and visible weight loss despite adequate forage supply. Each of these signals that the horse is not extracting full nutritional value from what it is consuming.
Soaking addresses this problem mechanically and directly. Submersion softens the physical structure of the hay, reducing the grinding force required from compromised molars. As Tribute Equine Nutrition confirms, soaking hay directly makes feed easier to chew for horses with dental issues, allowing them to process forage they would otherwise quid or avoid altogether. This is not a minor quality-of-life adjustment; it is a meaningful nutritional intervention. Poorly chewed hay passes through the hindgut largely unfermented, limiting both caloric absorption and protein utilization. Soaking restores a functional digestive pathway that dental compromise would otherwise block.
For horses with severe dental deterioration, soaked hay alone may not be sufficient. Pairing soaked forage with a complete feed, hay replacer pellets, or a senior formula ensures the horse meets its fiber and caloric requirements even when long-stem intake is limited. Splitting daily intake into four to six smaller meals further reduces chewing strain and improves overall digestive efficiency.
Hay selection also plays a critical role before the bucket ever fills with water. Kentucky Equine Research notes that forage variety is a meaningful factor for aged horses with dental problems, and coarser, stemmy hay remains mechanically challenging even after soaking. A finer, leafier hay reduces the baseline chewing burden considerably. Sainfoin, with its soft leaf structure, offers a natural advantage here; its forage texture is gentler on compromised dentition before soaking even enters the equation, making it a practical choice for horses that need every advantage the diet can provide.
Esophageal obstruction, commonly called choke, is classified as a common equine emergency by the UC Davis Center for Equine Health, and eating speed sits at the center of the risk equation. When a horse consumes forage too rapidly, dry material can form a compact, poorly moistened bolus before it travels down the esophagus. Without adequate saliva to soften and lubricate that mass, the bolus can lodge partway down, causing distress, nasal discharge, and in serious cases, complications such as aspiration pneumonia. The mechanism is straightforward: speed reduces chewing time, and reduced chewing time means less saliva contact before swallowing.
Soaking addresses this vulnerability directly by pre-hydrating the forage before it ever enters the horse's mouth. A horse consuming already-wet hay is working with material that is pliable from the first bite, regardless of how quickly it eats. This moisture buffer substantially reduces the likelihood of a dry, rigid mass forming in the esophagus, even in horses that habitually eat at pace. As Bend Equine Medical Center and other veterinary sources confirm, pre-soaking forage can meaningfully reduce the risk of esophageal obstruction by eliminating the conditions that allow a compacted bolus to form.
For horses with a documented choke history, soaking is a standard component of feeding management protocols. Veterinarians and equine nutritionists typically combine soaked hay with slow-feeder nets and reduced meal sizes to address the problem from multiple angles simultaneously. The AAEP's guidance on understanding choke in horses reinforces this multi-strategy approach, recognizing that no single intervention is sufficient on its own.
Importantly, the benefit extends well beyond horses with a clinical choke history. In group turnout situations or multi-horse barns, social competition at feeding time can cause even ordinarily relaxed horses to accelerate their eating pace involuntarily. Horses that would never bolt feed in isolation may do so consistently under competitive conditions. Providing soaked hay in these environments creates a practical safety buffer for the entire group.
Soaking does not eliminate choke risk entirely, and owners of horses that bolt feed should layer in additional strategies. Placing large rocks or salt licks in feed buckets physically interrupts eating rhythm and forces the horse to slow down and navigate around the obstacle. Reducing individual meal sizes and increasing feeding frequency limits the volume available at any one time, removing the incentive to rush. These strategies, used alongside soaked hay, provide the most comprehensive approach to managing fast-eating behavior.
Horses typically require between 5 and 15 gallons of water per day under normal conditions, with that figure climbing considerably during summer heat or intense exercise. For horses that are reluctant drinkers, or those working hard in hot and humid climates where sweat losses compound daily fluid needs, meeting that threshold through voluntary drinking alone can be a genuine challenge. Soaked hay addresses this gap passively, delivering meaningful moisture through every feeding without requiring any change in drinking behavior.
It is important to frame this benefit accurately: soaked hay is not a substitute for free-choice water access, which must always remain available. What it does offer is an additive contribution to total daily fluid intake. Horses fed soaked hay consistently have been observed to reduce their voluntary bucket drinking, which can initially concern owners. This reduction reflects the horse compensating for moisture already consumed through feed, not a decline in hydration status.
Several populations benefit most from this effect. Horses in active training or competition carry elevated fluid demands from sweat losses that free-choice water alone may not fully replace. Horses recovering from illness often have hydration status closely monitored, and wet forage supports intake without forcing consumption. Senior horses represent another important group; age-related decline in thirst drive is a well-documented clinical observation, meaning older horses may drink less even when their physiological need is unchanged or increasing.
While this benefit ranks as secondary to the metabolic, respiratory, and dental advantages covered in earlier sections, it carries real clinical weight. Adequate hydration directly supports gut motility, and compromised gut motility is a primary pathway to impaction colic. According to soaking guidance from Kentucky Equine Research, soaking measurably alters the moisture profile of hay, confirming that the hydration contribution is physiologically tangible. For horses where colic prevention is a management priority, the moisture delivered through soaked hay is a straightforward, low-effort layer of protection worth building into daily routine.
Soaking hay delivers real benefits, but the process extracts far more from each bale than most horse owners anticipate. Understanding these tradeoffs is essential before making soaking a cornerstone of your feeding program.
The mechanism that makes soaking effective for reducing water-soluble carbohydrates is the same mechanism that strips other valuable nutrients from the hay. Water-soluble vitamins, particularly B vitamins and vitamin C, leach into the soaking water alongside WSC. Key minerals including potassium, calcium, and phosphorus follow the same path. Kentucky Equine Research confirms that soaking significantly alters the water-soluble nutrient profile of hay, meaning the forage your horse consumes post-soak is nutritionally distinct from what you started with. The 2014 Moore-Colyer et al. study published in PLoS ONE, which examined five different wetting treatments across nutrient content and microbial outcomes, established that preparation method matters considerably, with measurably different results depending on treatment type. This is not a minor footnote; it is a fundamental characteristic of the process.
SPILLERS' guidance recommends feeding approximately 20% more hay by weight after soaking to compensate for dry matter loss into the water. This is a practical and necessary adjustment, but it addresses volume rather than nutrient density. Feeding more soaked hay by weight does not restore the micronutrients that have already been discarded with the wastewater. Horses maintained on soaked hay long-term may therefore require targeted supplementation, particularly for water-soluble vitamins and electrolyte minerals. Consulting an equine nutritionist before establishing a long-term soaking protocol is a reasonable and increasingly common step among informed horse owners.
Extended soaks in warm weather introduce a hygiene risk that directly conflicts with one of soaking's primary benefits. Hay submerged in warm water for several hours creates favorable conditions for microbial proliferation. Expert commentary within equine nutrition communities notes that bacterial load on soaked hay becomes a meaningful variable after approximately one hour. For horses soaked to support respiratory health, contaminated hay introduces a different category of respiratory and digestive risk, potentially offsetting the benefit of reduced dust and mold exposure.
The daily effort required to soak hay properly is frequently underestimated, especially in multi-horse operations. Sourcing and managing large containers, filling and draining water repeatedly, adjusting soak times for seasonal temperatures, and disposing of nutrient-laden wastewater all add up to a meaningful time commitment. In freezing temperatures, that commitment becomes logistically complex. The wastewater itself, concentrated with leached minerals and potential microbial content, is not simply a neutral byproduct.
The University of Guelph's 2019 Journal of Animal Science study, as analyzed by Mad Barn, confirmed that soaking and steaming produce significantly different nutrient profiles. This finding reinforces that choosing a forage treatment method involves real nutritional tradeoffs, not just logistical preferences. Steaming largely preserves water-soluble nutrients while addressing hygienic quality; soaking reduces WSC but depletes those same nutrients. Neither method is universally superior, but both require deliberate consideration within the broader context of your horse's complete nutritional program.
Soaking and steaming are often discussed as though they are two versions of the same intervention. They are not. Each method targets a distinct problem, and conflating them leads to mismanaged horses and preventable health setbacks.
When WSC reduction is the primary goal, soaking is the method that delivers. Submersing hay in water physically leaches water-soluble carbohydrates out of the forage, making it the frontline dietary intervention for horses managing insulin dysregulation, Equine Metabolic Syndrome, or a history of laminitis. No other at-home forage treatment achieves this effect. Steaming does not leach carbohydrates, and no amount of heating will replicate what water extraction accomplishes at the molecular level. For metabolic horses, this distinction is clinically significant.
Where soaking falls short is hygiene. Submerging hay wets mold spores, bacteria, and yeast without killing them; in warm conditions, extended soaking can actually encourage microbial growth. Steaming at high temperatures, by contrast, destroys pathogens directly, making it the superior choice when respiratory health is the driving concern. For horses with Inflammatory Airway Disease or Recurrent Airway Obstruction, reducing inhaled spore counts matters more than reducing sugar content, and steaming addresses that need directly.
SPILLERS states explicitly that steaming has little effect on WSC levels. This matters enormously for horse owners who manage horses with both metabolic and respiratory challenges. Assuming that steaming alone covers both bases is a clinical error that could leave a laminitis-prone horse consuming unchanged sugar levels.
For horses with dual concerns, the most comprehensive approach documented in equine nutrition research is soaking first to reduce WSC, followed by steaming in a commercial steamer to restore hygienic quality. SPILLERS acknowledges this combination is not practical for every owner, given the cost of commercial hay steamers, but it represents the most thorough outcome currently available.
Ultimately, neither method is universally superior. The correct choice depends on the horse's primary diagnosis, the owner's available resources, and the baseline WSC content of the hay being fed. Starting with a hay analysis removes the guesswork and allows the treatment method to match the actual problem.
Everything covered so far frames soaking as a valuable tool, and in many situations it genuinely is. But a more fundamental question deserves direct attention: what if the hay you start with simply does not require the intervention in the first place?
Soaking is a downstream correction. It addresses the consequences of a forage choice rather than the forage choice itself. When a hay is high in water-soluble carbohydrates, soaking becomes necessary to make that hay appropriate for metabolic horses. But when the hay is inherently low in WSC from the outset, the need to soak it in the first place is significantly reduced or eliminated entirely. This is the upstream argument, and it changes how thoughtful horse owners approach forage management at a foundational level. Hay analysis before committing to any treatment protocol is increasingly recommended precisely because understanding your starting point is the logical prerequisite to every decision that follows.
Sainfoin is a naturally non-GMO legume forage that offers exactly this kind of inherently favorable nutrient profile. Its low-sugar composition makes it a strong candidate for horses that would otherwise be managed on soaked hay for metabolic reasons. The critical distinction is that sainfoin delivers this benefit without the tradeoffs that soaking inevitably introduces: no nutrient leaching, no mandatory 20% weight increase to compensate for dry matter loss, no bacterial growth risk during warm-weather submersion, and no labor-intensive daily protocol. For owners managing multiple horses or maintaining consistent feeding schedules around training and competition, that practical difference is substantial.
Heavenly Hay's sainfoin carries an additional advantage that soaking cannot replicate: a rich concentration of condensed tannins. These bioactive compounds support healthy microbial balance in the hindgut, improve protein absorption efficiency, and help reduce gas production. These are not incidental benefits. They represent a meaningful contribution to digestive health that is fully preserved when the hay is fed without any water treatment.
This raises an important nuance worth raising with your equine nutritionist. Tannins vary in their water solubility depending on their molecular form, condensed versus hydrolyzable. Whether soaking sainfoin would reduce its tannin content is a question that has not yet been fully resolved in the research literature. It is a genuine open variable, and it is one more reason why hay analysis and professional guidance should precede any treatment decision rather than follow it.
For horses in active training or competition, where managing glycemic response is a performance priority, a 2019 University of Guelph study published in the Journal of Animal Science demonstrated that forage treatment measurably alters nutrient profiles and blood sugar response in Standardbred racehorses. Selecting a forage with a naturally favorable nutrient profile from the start is a proactive strategy that reduces reliance on variable, labor-intensive interventions. Soaking works, but starting with better hay works smarter.
Soaking hay effectively requires more than submerging a flake and waiting. These six guidelines form a practical checklist for getting consistent, safe results every time.
1. Match Soak Duration to Water Temperature
In warm weather (16°C/61°F and above), soak hay for 1 to 3 hours. In cold weather, extend that window to 6 to 12 hours. The logic is straightforward: warm water leaches water-soluble carbohydrates more efficiently, so shorter contact time achieves meaningful WSC reduction. Cold water moves more slowly through the forage structure, requiring a longer soak to produce comparable results. Per SPILLERS guidance, these ranges represent the practical window for WSC reduction goals, not arbitrary estimates.
2. Full Submersion Is Non-Negotiable
Any section of hay sitting above the waterline will retain its original WSC content. Use a weighted hay net, a purpose-made soaking container, or a secured lid to keep every portion fully submerged from start to finish. Partial submersion produces inconsistent results and defeats the purpose of the process entirely.
3. Always Use Fresh Water
Reusing soaking water reintroduces the leached sugars, minerals, and potential contaminants directly back into the hay. Each soak requires a fresh fill, no exceptions.
4. Weigh Up by 20% and Consider Mineral Supplementation
Dry matter leaches into the soaking water alongside sugars, meaning each portion contains less actual forage than the scale suggests. Increase your weighed-out hay by approximately 20% to compensate, per SPILLERS. For horses on long-term soaked hay programs, consult an equine nutritionist about targeted mineral supplementation, as macro and trace minerals are also lost during soaking.
5. Discard Soaking Water Promptly and Safely
Sugar-laden soaking water supports bacterial growth, particularly in warm conditions. Discard it immediately after each soak, well away from areas horses can access. In warm weather, stay toward the lower end of the 1 to 3 hour window to limit bacterial proliferation in both the water and the hay itself.
6. Get a Hay Analysis Before Soaking Higher-Risk Horses
For horses with EMS, laminitis, or insulin dysregulation, soaking without a baseline WSC figure is guesswork. Hay composition varies significantly between cuts, seasons, and fields, meaning one bale may require soaking while another from a different lot may not. A wet chemistry hay analysis for your specific lot is the only reliable way to confirm whether soaking is necessary and whether it is achieving the target reduction your horse requires.
Soaking hay is a practical tool, but for certain horses, it should be part of a professionally supervised protocol rather than an independent management decision. Here are the situations where consulting an equine nutritionist moves from helpful to essential.
1. Your horse has been diagnosed with EMS, insulin dysregulation, or recurrent laminitis. For these horses, soaking hay without prior analysis is an assumption, not a strategy. A nutritionist can arrange a hay analysis and determine whether soaking your specific lot reliably reduces WSC to the safe threshold of 10% or less on a dry matter basis. Because WSC reduction varies by hay type, water temperature, soak duration, and even the individual bale, blind soaking offers no guarantee of compliance with that target. A professionally guided protocol replaces guesswork with verified data.
2. Your horse has been on a long-term soaking program. Chronic soaking progressively leaches water-soluble vitamins and minerals from hay. Over time, these losses can contribute to deficiencies in nutrients that directly affect hoof quality, coat condition, and immune function. Key minerals including zinc, copper, and selenium are particularly vulnerable to depletion through water exposure. A nutritionist can assess current status through targeted testing and recommend supplementation to fill the gaps that soaking inadvertently creates.
3. Your horse is in active training or performance work. Soaking addresses sugar content but does not constitute a complete energy management plan. Performance horses require a carefully calibrated balance of glycemic management, energy density, and nutrient availability. A nutritionist can evaluate forage selection, treatment method, and supplementation together as a coordinated system rather than treating soaking as a standalone solution.
4. You are following outdated blanket soaking recommendations. The industry is shifting toward individualized, data-driven forage management. Analysis-first protocols are becoming the professional standard, and a nutritionist can help you build a program grounded in your horse's actual hay profile rather than generalized guidance.
5. You are considering transitioning to a naturally low-WSC forage like sainfoin. Switching hay types carries real digestive risk if the transition is rushed or unstructured. A nutritionist can verify that the new forage meets your horse's complete nutritional requirements and design a gradual transition that protects hindgut microbial balance throughout the process.
Soaking hay delivers genuine, research-backed benefits across five well-defined clinical contexts: metabolic horses managing insulin dysregulation, respiratory cases sensitive to dust and mold, seniors struggling with dental compromise, choke-prone horses that eat too aggressively, and horses needing supplemental hydration support. Those benefits are real, and in the right situations, soaking is a legitimate and responsible management tool.
But the costs are equally real. Every soak leaches water-soluble vitamins, phosphorus, potassium, and other minerals alongside the sugars you are targeting. Bacterial populations can reach harmful levels in warm weather within hours. The daily labor of containers, timing, and waste water disposal adds up quickly. And because soaked hay is nutrient-diluted, SPILLERS recommends feeding approximately 20% more by weight just to compensate.
The more useful question is not how to soak, but whether soaking is the right intervention for your specific horse at all. For many owners, the upstream solution is simpler: start with a naturally low-WSC, nutrient-dense forage that does not require remediation. Heavenly Hay sainfoin delivers inherently low sugar levels, high-quality protein, and exceptional digestibility, addressing the same concerns that drive most soaking decisions without the tradeoffs. It is worth exploring whether it is the right fit for your horse.
Soaking hay can be a game-changer for the right horse, but it is not a one-size-fits-all solution. The key takeaways are simple: soaking effectively reduces sugars and airborne irritants, supports horses with metabolic or respiratory conditions, and eases chewing for seniors with dental challenges. However, it also costs time, nutrients, and labor, so it deserves a thoughtful approach rather than a reflexive one.
Before you haul out the buckets, assess your horse's specific needs. Talk to your veterinarian or an equine nutritionist to determine whether soaking is truly warranted. If it is, commit to doing it correctly for maximum benefit. If it is not, skip it confidently and invest that energy elsewhere.
Your horse's health deserves informed decisions, not habits built on guesswork. Start with the facts, and feed with purpose.
